Ethnic Violence in Manipur: Deepening Divide between Christian Hill Tribes and Hindu Meitei People


In Manipur, a state in India’s northeast, a recent eruption of ethnic violence has left more than 70 people dead and forced 30,000 others to flee their homes. The violence, which began on May 3, has resulted in widespread destruction and displacement, leaving towns and villages in a state of chaos. The majority of the victims belong to the mainly Christian hill tribes, such as the Kukis, while members of the predominantly Hindu Meitei people have also been targeted.

The aftermath of the violence paints a bleak picture of the region. Food and medicine shortages have become acute, with many people going hungry for days. The presence of army and paramilitary troops enforces a curfew, while the suspension of internet services further isolates the affected communities. Schools, offices, and shops remain closed, and thousands of people are stranded in overcrowded and unsanitary refugee camps. Reports of fresh violence over the weekend have only added to the misery, leading to further displacements.

The violence has exacerbated the existing tensions between the Christian hill tribes and the Hindu Meitei people. Coexistence and a return to peaceful harmony seem unlikely after such brutality. People who once lived alongside each other now express a deep-seated distrust, as they witnessed friends and neighbors standing by while innocent men, women, and children were killed.

For many, the only solution now is separation. The Kuki community, feeling targeted and subjected to ethnic cleansing, believes that having their own state is the only way to ensure their safety as a minority. The idea of trusting the Manipur government or the police again seems far-fetched, as they feel abandoned and betrayed.

The underlying cause of the violence stems from a plan to grant the Meitei people the status of a “scheduled tribe,” which would provide them with access to government job and college quotas under India’s affirmative action policy. Tribal leaders argue that the Meiteis are already better off and hold dominance in various sectors, including government, police, and civil service. Granting them further privileges, they believe, would be unjust and allow the Meiteis to encroach upon the forest lands that have been traditionally occupied by the hill tribes for centuries.

Each group blames the other for the violence, and conspiracy theories have fueled further distrust. The hill tribes claim that the police, who were meant to protect them, either remained passive or even participated in the violence. There is a prevailing belief that the government was complicit in allowing the mobs to unleash destruction on the hill tribes.

In response to the carnage, tribal legislators from the state assembly have called on the central government to establish a separate administration for the hill people, allowing them to live peacefully as neighbors with the state of Manipur. They argue that living alongside the Meiteis is tantamount to death for their people.

The deepening divide between the Christian hill tribes and the Hindu Meitei people in Manipur has shattered any hope of a swift return to normalcy. The physical separation that already exists between the communities is now turning into complete segregation. The memory of the violence and the cries of those who lost their lives fuel the determination to seek a separate hill state, as trust in the Manipur government continues to erode.

In conclusion, the recent ethnic violence in Manipur has intensified the divide between the predominantly Christian hill tribes and the largely Hindu Meitei people. The violence has resulted in significant loss of life, displacement, and a sense of deep-seated mistrust between the communities. The idea of coexistence seems distant, as both sides harbor a strong belief in the necessity